Battlefield 6’s choice to make always-online a necessity, even for its single-player campaign, is getting a lot of negative feedback. This is because connectivity is such a big part of gaming these days. Fans are upset, angry, and frustrated that a network problem may ruin a single-player experience, turning what should be a story-driven trip into a risky gamble.
Why the Always-Online Mandate Infuriates Players
1. Disconnections Kill Immersion and Flow
Due to Battlefield 6’s always online requirement you can getdisconnected from the Singleplayer Campaign!
byu/WintorOperator inpcmasterrace
Single-player campaigns are supposed to be journeys that don’t stop. But with Battlefield 6, even a short connection outage causes an error like “Connection Lost,” which stops your mission until you log back in. That messes off the flow of the story and makes it seem like a penalty for living in an area with a lousy connection. A lot of fans on Reddit have already voiced their concern over this:
“I started [the campaign] like 30 min after release … placed in a queue … my number was like 450,000.”
When you can’t rely on stability, you’re constantly risking being booted out mid-scene or mission.
2. Treating Single-Player Like Multiplayer
Single-player games shouldn’t need the same servers as competitive games. Battlefield 6 treats its single-player game as an online-only service by making you check your network, unlock synchronization, and connect to live services. That choice goes against a basic rule: solo modes should be usable without an internet connection or with very little dependency on outside services.
3. “Always Online” = DRM That Hurts Paying Players
Always-online DRM, also known as persistent authentication, has always been a hot topic. It is meant to stop piracy, but it often has the opposite effect: if servers go down, it keeps legitimate consumers out. Players of Battlefield 6 are upset that they have to pay for a game that can’t work without being connected to the internet, even in modes that usually work offline.
Community Reaction
Many people on Reddit and other forums report that they had to wait in long lines just to start the campaign, which should have been a quick solo experience. Some people are calling the restriction “DRM BS” or saying that the developers are making it harder for honest players to play.
Some fans are saying they won’t buy Battlefield 6 or are telling others to boycott it if an offline fallback or bot mode isn’t added. People aren’t just complaining about this; they’re very angry about how live service is ruining their expectations for single-player games.
The fanbase’s strong, principled response to Battlefield 6’s mandate that players always be online in single-player mode shows how upset they are. People aren’t just complaining; they’re standing up for what single-player modes should be: immersive, uninterrupted, and not dependent on how stable your internet connection is or how healthy EA’s servers are.
